Thursday, March 29, 2012

Reuters: Money: Best Buy sales, restructuring disappoint

Reuters: Money
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Best Buy sales, restructuring disappoint
Mar 30th 2012, 00:07

A Best Buy store in Westminster, Colorado June 27, 2007. REUTERS/Rick Wilking

A Best Buy store in Westminster, Colorado June 27, 2007.

Credit: Reuters/Rick Wilking

By Dhanya Skariachan

Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:07pm EDT

(Reuters) - Best Buy Co reported weaker-than-expected quarterly sales and said it would close 50 large U.S. stores and lay off another 400 employees, disappointing investors looking for even deeper cuts to turn around the world's largest consumer electronics chain.

The news drove Best Buy shares down as much as 10 percent to touch an intraday low of $23.97, shaving $920 million off its market capitalization to $8.4 billion. The shares were down just over 7 percent at $24.71 in afternoon trading.

Analysts said the company needs to close more than 50 of its 1,100 big box stores to cut costs at a time when shoppers are increasingly buying electronics online. The retailer, which employs 180,000 people, said it would cut 400 corporate and support jobs, but did not say how many jobs would be lost as a result of the store closures.

"These are steps in the right direction," BB&T Capital Markets analyst Anthony Chukumba said. "Beyond the weak (sales), I think what the market is telling you is that they don't think they went far enough from a restructuring perspective."

Best Buy should try to relocate more stores to smaller locations, sub-lease portions of their bigger stores and shutter more unprofitable stores, he said.

A Best Buy spokeswoman said it has yet to finalize the locations and timing of the store closings. The company expects the restructuring efforts to cut costs by $800 million in the next three years, including $250 million this year.

Overall, landlords with the biggest exposure to big-box stores are Canadian company Callowy Real Estate Investment Trust, National Retail Properties Inc and Retail Properties of America Inc, which is set to go public and was formerly known as Inland Western.

"But nearly everyone has some exposure to Best Buy at this point," said Keefe, Bruyette & Woods analyst Benjamin Yang.

THE REAL ESTATE IMPACT

Best Buy's decision to close big-box stores was not surprising to the real estate investment community, Yang said.

But the sector, particularly real estate companies that focus on big-box shopping centers, has been wrestling with filling empty stores or soon-empty stores left by the bankruptcies of Circuit City, Mervyns and more recently Sears Holdings Corp's decision to close or sell off stores.

Some landlords have filled spaces left by closings. While others, such as General Growth Properties Inc's plan to raze the big boxes and replace them with smaller, specialty stores.

"It's hard to say today who the natural replacement would be for that space," Yang said. "I think right now there are none. But longer term, down the road, it's hard to say who might take those big-box spaces or even if big-box space will be a thing of the past."

AMAZON BEATING BEST BUY?

Despite offering bigger discounts and free shipping to lure shoppers from its rivals, including Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Amazon.com Inc, Best Buy's same-store sales fell 2.4 percent in the quarter, including a 2.2 percent decline at its U.S. stores open at least 14 months.

Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter was looking for a 1.8 percent same-store sales decline in the quarter, including a 1.4 percent decline at its domestic stores.

Its sales rose to $16.63 billion, but fell far short of the analysts' average estimate of $17.23 billion, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

Unlike the 2010 holiday season, when Best Buy held the line on discounts and promoted only expensive goods, this time it offered deep discounts on everything from flat-screen TVs to digital cameras. It also promised to match any lower prices that its brick-and-mortar competitors advertised during the season's peak and offered free online shipping.

Still, industry watchers contend that Best Buy stores increasingly serve as physical showrooms for online retailers.

Amazon enjoys its largest pricing advantage versus brick-and-mortar rivals in the consumer electronics segment, with prices 17 percent lower on average, Chukumba has estimated.

"We remain concerned about the sustainability of Best Buy's big-box model. The company is gradually becoming a physical showroom for online retailers and the prevalence of smartphones makes comparison shopping increasingly easy," Pachter said.

Best Buy lost $1.7 billion, or $4.89 a share, in the fourth quarter that ended March 3, compared with net income of $651 million, or $1.62 a share, a year earlier.

Excluding charges, it earned $2.47 a share. Analysts were looking for a profit of $2.16 a share on that basis, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

THE SMALLER THE BETTER

Best Buy is now trying to focus on its smaller format stores. It will close 50 U.S. big-box stores and open 100 Best Buy small-format, stand-alone stores in the current fiscal 2013.

The changes should help lower the retailer's overall cost structure, Chief Executive Brian Dunn said in a statement.

Best Buy plans to invest some of the savings into improving customer service, including expanding its Reward Zone Silver loyalty program, and giving store employees more training before the next holiday season.

It will also offer competitive prices as part of its push to drive revenue, and over time, some of the savings should fall to the bottom line, Dunn said.

For the current financial year, Best Buy sees earnings of $3.50 to $3.80 a share, before items.

(Reporting By Dhanya Skariachan and Ilaina Jonas; editing by Gerald E. McCormick, Maureen Bavdek, Dave Zimmerman and Andre Grenon)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Money: Bernanke: Economy to return to trend growth

Reuters: Money
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Bernanke: Economy to return to trend growth
Mar 29th 2012, 19:01

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke gives a lecture on the 2008 global financial crisis in a classroom at George Washington University School of Business in Washington, March 29, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Money: Public pension finances rebound slightly: Census

Reuters: Money
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Public pension finances rebound slightly: Census
Mar 29th 2012, 18:40

By Lisa Lambert

WASHINGTON | Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:40pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The finances of public pensions rebounded in the final quarter of 2011 from the quarter before, but the cash and security holdings were still below end-of-2010 levels, according to U.S. Census data released on Thursday.

Gains in stocks and international securities lifted holdings 3.2 percent from the third quarter to $2.61 trillion, slightly less than the $2.64 trillion in the fourth quarter of 2010.

"The public pension funds, in the main, last year went about sideways, said Keith Brainard, research director for the National Association of State Retirement Administrators, adding that the median investment return was around 1 or 2 percent. "And the fourth quarter was strong after that very difficult third quarter that included the market losses."

The 100 largest state and local government employee retirement systems earned $97.1 billion on their investments in the fourth quarter, compared to the $198.8 billion loss they suffered in the third quarter, which was the first loss in more than a year and the largest in more than five years.

"In the middle of the year we're seeing three things," said Hank Kim, executive director of the National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems. "First, the ripple effects in the supply chain from the tsunami and nuclear disaster, I think, impacted some of the economic growth and the market. Second, you had the whole silliness with the raising of the debt ceiling. And in Europe you had the crisis."

Last summer the U.S. Congress and President Barack Obama agreed to a plan to start cutting $1.2 trillion in spending in 2013 after a long stand-off over the country's $1.3 trillion deficit and $15 trillion debt.

"The first quarter of 2012 should be good," Kim said. "If you look at the broader markets, I think they came to life since January 1. Hopefully when the market closes on Friday, we can capture that."

Meanwhile, employees pitched $9.2 billion into the retirement systems over the quarter, slightly down from the $9.5 billion they contributed during the same period a year ago.

Government contributions, essentially the taxpayer tab, also dipped, to $21.5 billion from $22.4 billion the year before.

Still, total contributions grew throughout 2010 and 2011, and the total $33.4 billion that governments and employees put in during the second quarter of 2011 was the highest in more than five years.

Typically, when investment returns are low, governments increase contributions. But during some of the worst budget crises in recent memory, state and local governments cut back just as the stock market plunged.

With recent retirement breakdowns in Rhode Island and the threats of further fiscal stress in other places, states are worried about how to fund future retiree benefits without cutting spending on other vital programs. Most states are in the thick of budget negotiations for the upcoming fiscal year, and many are bound by their constitutions to pay retiree pension benefits.

Almost everyone agrees pension funds can pay for current retirees but are short on future obligations. Estimates of the shortfall range from just under $700 billion to $3 trillion, based on how investment returns are forecast. The systems prefer using historical averages, while critics say they cannot bank on achieving the return highs they experienced before the crisis.

California's pension fund for public employees made international headlines earlier this month when it lowered its assumed rate of return to 7.5 percent from 7.75 percent.

The financial crisis caused the earnings on public pensions investments, the funds' largest sources of revenue, to plummet for three quarters in a row from the end of 2008 to the beginning of 2009. The value of their holdings scraped the bottom at $2.09 trillion in the first quarter of 2009.

Since then, they have slowly inched closer to the $2.92 trillion they reached in the final quarter of 2007, before the recession devastated their balance sheets.

"Public pension funds keep a long-term perspective, and it has been a strong few years since the bottom of the market in 2009," Brainard said.

(Editing by Andrea Evans)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Money: Big money funds' fees outpace investor returns

Reuters: Money
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Big money funds' fees outpace investor returns
Mar 29th 2012, 19:43

By Tim McLaughlin

BOSTON | Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:43pm EDT

BOSTON (Reuters) - The biggest U.S. money market funds have done a better job of preserving their management fees than many realize, a development that may surprise investors whose dividends have plummeted 96 percent from peak levels five years ago.

Investors collected $5.24 billion in total dividends from money funds in 2011, a 72 percent decline from $18.6 billion two years earlier and a huge plunge from the $127.9 billion gained back in 2007, before the Federal Reserve chopped short-term rates to near zero.

In contrast, the fees collected by money fund sponsors declined to $4.7 billion last year, a 57 percent drop from 2009 and a 52 percent decline since five years earlier, according to data from the Investment Company Institute, the trade group for the fund industry.

The biggest retail funds in the industry did even better, showing fee declines of less than 25 percent since 2009.

"Many sponsors have seen a drop in management fee income - however, not nearly on the level that investment income for investors has declined," said Scott Sullivan, a senior analyst at research firm Celent.

The big players have demonstrated plenty of resiliency in even the most trying market conditions, said Pete Crane, who runs research firm Crane Data. Large funds, which generate far more in fees than are needed to pay for their managers, credit analysts and other expenses, have enormous economies of scale, he said.

"The money fund industry has yet to see any real consolidation or the exodus of a major player," Crane said. "If the pressure were that acute, you would see fees being introduced."

While most of the decline in dividends has resulted from lower rates and fees absorbing a larger proportion of fund income, total assets in money funds have declined 13 percent over the past five years.

SMALLER FEE DECLINE

At Fidelity Investments, for example, the giant $116.6 billion Fidelity Cash Reserves generated at least $200 million in annual management fees in each of the past three fiscal years, which end on November 30. Over that time, the annual fee declined only 21 percent while net investment income for investors tumbled 98 percent.

Fees also absorbed a much greater proportion of available income last year. The fund's management fee was $203.6 million in fiscal 2011, or nearly 12 times more than the $17.2 million in net investment income designated for investors.

In fiscal 2009, it was a different story for investors. They received nearly $1.1 billion in net investment income, four times more than the fund's management fees of $258.2 million, the fund's regulatory filings showed.

Fidelity's fund is managed by a group of professionals out of a modest office in Merrimack, New Hampshire, about 60 miles north of the firm's Boston headquarters. The fund lists only a single manager, Robert Litterst, a 20-year Fidelity veteran and the chief investment officer for money markets.

Fidelity, the largest money market fund manager in the United States, said the fund's management fee expense ratio of about 17 basis points has been less than 90 percent of its closest peers in recent years. The company's money market business is designed to handle extended periods of low interest rates, spokesman Vincent Loporchio said.

"Fidelity takes a long-term view of our money market fund business and meeting customer needs," Loporchio said.

Much the same was true at Vanguard Group's Prime Money Market Fund, the No. 2 retail fund with $114 billion in assets. Over the past three fiscal years, the fund's management and administrative fees declined by 23 percent to $154 million while net investment income for investors shrank by 94 percent, from $1.45 billion to $90.5 million.

Ultra-low interest rates are at the root of the diminished income for investors, a Vanguard spokeswoman said.

MOST WAIVE FEES

Still, nearly every money market fund is forgoing a portion of the fees they could collect based on their contracted expense rates in order to keep yields in positive territory, according to fund tracker iMoneyNet Inc.

In the fourth quarter, 98 percent of all taxable funds waived at least some fees, compared with 66 percent in the same period of 2008, iMoneyNet said. Money fund fee waivers for the industry topped $5.2 billion in total last year, compared with $3.6 billion in 2009. Not all of the waivers represent lost income for fund managers as some of the money would have been paid out to brokers and distributors.

Big players such as Fidelity, Federated Investors Inc., JPMorgan Asset Management and Vanguard that have weathered the low-rates storm better are poised to make further gains as expected regulatory reform will force consolidation, analysts said.

"Economies of scale will contribute to a larger percentage of money market assets in the hands of fewer fund sponsors," Celent's Sullivan said.

(Reporting by Tim McLaughlin; Editing by Aaron Pressman, Walden Siew, Gary Hill)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Money: Best Buy sales, restructuring disappoint

Reuters: Money
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Best Buy sales, restructuring disappoint
Mar 29th 2012, 18:33

A Best Buy store in Westminster, Colorado June 27, 2007. REUTERS/Rick Wilking

A Best Buy store in Westminster, Colorado June 27, 2007.

Credit: Reuters/Rick Wilking

By Dhanya Skariachan

Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:33pm EDT

(Reuters) - Best Buy Co reported weaker-than-expected quarterly sales and said it would close 50 large U.S. stores and lay off another 400 employees, disappointing investors looking for even deeper cuts to turn around the world's largest consumer electronics chain.

The news drove Best Buy shares down as much as 10 percent to touch an intraday low of $23.97, shaving $920 million off its market capitalization to $8.4 billion. The shares were down just over 7 percent at $24.71 in afternoon trading.

Analysts said the company needs to close more than 50 of its 1,100 big box stores to cut costs at a time when shoppers are increasingly buying electronics online. The retailer, which employs 180,000 people, said it would cut 400 corporate and support jobs, but did not say how many jobs would be lost as a result of the store closures.

"These are steps in the right direction," BB&T Capital Markets analyst Anthony Chukumba said. "Beyond the weak (sales), I think what the market is telling you is that they don't think they went far enough from a restructuring perspective."

Best Buy should try to relocate more stores to smaller locations, sub-lease portions of their bigger stores and shutter more unprofitable stores, he said.

A Best Buy spokeswoman said it has yet to finalize the locations and timing of the store closings. The company expects the restructuring efforts to cut costs by $800 million in the next three years, including $250 million this year.

Overall, landlords with the biggest exposure to big-box stores are Canadian company Callowy Real Estate Investment Trust, National Retail Properties Inc and Retail Properties of America Inc, which is set to go public and was formerly known as Inland Western.

"But nearly everyone has some exposure to Best Buy at this point," said Keefe, Bruyette & Woods analyst Benjamin Yang.

THE REAL ESTATE IMPACT

Best Buy's decision to close big-box stores was not surprising to the real estate investment community, Yang said.

But the sector, particularly real estate companies that focus on big-box shopping centers, has been wrestling with filling empty stores or soon-empty stores left by the bankruptcies of Circuit City, Mervyns and more recently Sears Holdings Corp's decision to close or sell off stores.

Some landlords have filled spaces left by closings. While others, such as General Growth Properties Inc's plan to raze the big boxes and replace them with smaller, specialty stores.

"It's hard to say today who the natural replacement would be for that space," Yang said. "I think right now there are none. But longer term, down the road, it's hard to say who might take those big-box spaces or even if big-box space will be a thing of the past."

AMAZON BEATING BEST BUY?

Despite offering bigger discounts and free shipping to lure shoppers from its rivals, including Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Amazon.com Inc, Best Buy's same-store sales fell 2.4 percent in the quarter, including a 2.2 percent decline at its U.S. stores open at least 14 months.

Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter was looking for a 1.8 percent same-store sales decline in the quarter, including a 1.4 percent decline at its domestic stores.

Its sales rose to $16.63 billion, but fell far short of the analysts' average estimate of $17.23 billion, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

Unlike the 2010 holiday season, when Best Buy held the line on discounts and promoted only expensive goods, this time it offered deep discounts on everything from flat-screen TVs to digital cameras. It also promised to match any lower prices that its brick-and-mortar competitors advertised during the season's peak and offered free online shipping.

Still, industry watchers contend that Best Buy stores increasingly serve as physical showrooms for online retailers.

Amazon enjoys its largest pricing advantage versus brick-and-mortar rivals in the consumer electronics segment, with prices 17 percent lower on average, Chukumba has estimated.

"We remain concerned about the sustainability of Best Buy's big-box model. The company is gradually becoming a physical showroom for online retailers and the prevalence of smartphones makes comparison shopping increasingly easy," Pachter said.

Best Buy lost $1.7 billion, or $4.89 a share, in the fourth quarter that ended March 3, compared with net income of $651 million, or $1.62 a share, a year earlier.

Excluding charges, it earned $2.47 a share. Analysts were looking for a profit of $2.16 a share on that basis, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

THE SMALLER THE BETTER

Best Buy is now trying to focus on its smaller format stores. It will close 50 U.S. big-box stores and open 100 Best Buy small-format, stand-alone stores in the current fiscal 2013.

The changes should help lower the retailer's overall cost structure, Chief Executive Brian Dunn said in a statement.

Best Buy plans to invest some of the savings into improving customer service, including expanding its Reward Zone Silver loyalty program, and giving store employees more training before the next holiday season.

It will also offer competitive prices as part of its push to drive revenue, and over time, some of the savings should fall to the bottom line, Dunn said.

For the current financial year, Best Buy sees earnings of $3.50 to $3.80 a share, before items.

(Reporting By Dhanya Skariachan and Ilaina Jonas; editing by Gerald E. McCormick, Maureen Bavdek, Dave Zimmerman and Andre Grenon)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Money: Merrill, Morgan Stanley seen losing grip on rich

Reuters: Money
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Merrill, Morgan Stanley seen losing grip on rich
Mar 29th 2012, 14:28

By Joseph A. Giannone

Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:28am EDT

(Reuters) - The biggest U.S. brokerages have set their sights set on attracting the wealthiest Americans, but a new study concludes a growing number of multi-millionaire households are taking their money elsewhere.

The share of high net worth customers' assets held by the top four brokers -- Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, Merrill Lynch, Wells Fargo Advisors and UBS Wealth Management Americas -- has fallen since the financial crisis and will continue to fall, research firm Cerulli Associates said in a report on Wednesday.

That market share, which peaked at 56 percent in 2007, fell to 45 percent last year and is expected to drop to 42 percent by 2014. The companies together had $2.1 trillion in assets from clients with at least $5 million to invest.

Boutique firms, trust companies, family offices and private-client businesses owned by rival investment banks are gaining those clients over the bigger brokerage houses, Cerulli said.

"Firms that were perceived as safe provided a safe haven for nervous investors and advisers that were ready to make a move," Cerulli analyst Rob Testa said.

That's not encouraging news for the big brokerages, which are targeting an ever-wealthier clientele to boost revenue and profitability.

Merrill, for example, is discouraging brokers from taking on new clients with less than $250,000 so that they have more time to find and work with million-dollar accounts.

Consulting firm McKinsey & Co recently declared the $1 million to $10 million account as the "sweet spot" for private banks, because these clients generate higher margins -- two to three times more than investors with tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.

Morgan Stanley declined to comment. Representatives of the other three companies did not respond to requests for comment.

Cerulli said the market shifts were first driven by the 2008 financial crisis, when Merrill was rescued by a Bank of America takeover and taxpayers bailed out Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and UBS to keep them solvent.

Waves of financial advisers, meanwhile, moved to smaller and more independent wealth managers in search of greater stability or fewer conflicts of interest.

Wealth managers that gained business include the private client units of banks such as Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Bank of New York Mellon and Barclays. This group eclipsed the big four brokerages for the first time in 2010, overseeing $2.2 trillion or 47 percent of U.S. high net worth assets.

Trust companies like Northern Trust also gained, as did multi-family offices such as Bessemer Trust and SunTrust Banks' GenSpring, whose clients span generations and can control hundreds of millions of dollars, the report showed.

Registered investment advisers and family-office firms grew the fastest, increasing assets under management by 18 percent to $356 billion in 2010, compared with a 2 percent boost among the big four brokerages.

The playing field also has been leveled, Testa said, in that smaller firms are competing with Wall Street's biggest banks in terms of investments and technology. On the other hand, wealth managers affiliated with investment banks can help sell private businesses, underwrite public offerings and extend credit.

"Everybody in the industry wants to serve this clientele," Testa said. "Size does not always beget success."

(Reporting By Joseph A. Giannone; Editing by Walden Siew and Steve Orlofsky)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

Reuters: Money: Hedge fund Laxey urges dividend hike at Alliance Trust

Reuters: Money
Reuters.com is your source for breaking news, business, financial and investing news, including personal finance and stocks. Reuters is the leading global provider of news, financial information and technology solutions to the world's media, financial institutions, businesses and individuals. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Hedge fund Laxey urges dividend hike at Alliance Trust
Mar 29th 2012, 11:39

By Tommy Wilkes

LONDON | Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:39am EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - Laxey Partners is calling on Alliance Trust to raise its dividend, the latest move by the Isle of Man-based hedge fund to try to shake up performance at one of Britain's largest investment trusts.

In a letter addressed to the trust's chairman Lesley Knox, Laxey said Alliance will be in a position to pay larger dividends when new tax rules come into force allowing some investment trusts to pay realized capital gains as dividends for the first time.

Laxey, which has waged a campaign dating back to 2010 to try and force Alliance to boost shareholder value, is upping its pressure on the trust to improve performance ahead of its annual general meeting next month.

Earlier this month, it put forward a resolution to fellow shareholders demanding the trust consider outsourcing management of its 2.9 billion pound portfolio of assets, and criticizing the performance of Alliance as "completely unacceptable."

Alliance Trust said on Thursday in response it had already hiked its dividend by 7 percent last year, the largest annual rise in two decades. Laxey also gave an example of how Alliance could increase its dividend by paying out all 2011 earnings per share and realized capital gains as a dividend.

"The example given by Laxey makes Greek finances look prudent," a spokesperson for the trust said.

Last year Alliance defeated a controversial shareholder resolution pushed by Laxey to set up an automatic buyback policy, which would have been triggered when a discount of its shares to net asset value fell below 10 percent.

A discount to net asset value occurs when the market places a lower value on a company - measured by its share price - than the value of its component assets. This is often because investors believe those assets are poorly managed or illiquid, and so their full value is not reflected in the shares.

Many investment trusts trade at such a discount, but few as wide as Alliance.

Alliance has already spent almost 250 million pounds buying back 67.7 million shares - equating to more than 10 percent of its stock - to try and narrow the gap, marking a sea-change in Alliance's historical approach to buybacks.

But the hedge fund continues to criticize its buyback policy as ineffective.

At December 31, Alliance had narrowed the discount to 15.5 percent from 17.1 percent 11-months earlier, although this has subsequently widened to more than 16 percent.

Oriel analysts said in a note that playing about with dividend payouts was only "smoke and mirrors."

"Neither of Laxey's recent proposals has merit in our view and we do not see the discount narrowing unless their original proposal of a discount control mechanism (DCM) is introduced, and/or performance picks up strongly and is sustained over a period of years, rather than months," they said, reiterating their "Negative" recommendation on the stock.

(Reporting by Tommy Wilkes; Editing by Laurence Fletcher and Jane Merriman)

  • Link this
  • Share this
  • Digg this
  • Email
  • Reprints

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.